data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2aa21/2aa212af6f6d528de2d9e9cf06c9da5ea82926aa" alt=""
Solving the diversification conundrum
08 October 2021
3 minute read
Financial markets have become much more correlated than a decade ago. Investors are struggling to diversify portfolios effectively, especially using traditional equity and bond asset allocation strategies. Can looking to the interaction of macroeconomic factors help to diversify portfolios better in a post-pandemic world?
Key points:
- Increased globalisation and easier central bank monetary policy have made it more difficult to diversify portfolios
- The change in correlations since the global financial crisis triggered by central bank asset-purchases and government spending programmes to tackle the pandemic makes it even more difficult to diversify portfolios
- Macroeconomic factors, like growth, inflation and monetary policy, can also influence correlations between assets
- Among the above macroeconomic variables, inflation is most negatively correlated with fixed income assets, while being positively correlated with commodities. Growth is most positively related with equities
- In looking at ways to diversify portfolios more effectively, linking portfolio diversification decisions with the prevalence and co-movement of macro indicators may be worth considering.
Traditional ways of investing have been turned on their head following the global financial crisis (GFC), increased globalisation and hike in central bank liquidity, making it tougher to diversify portfolios. Is there a solution for investors?
Global financial crisis
Asset classes are far more correlated with each other than was the case a decade ago or so. Looking at investing in a broad range of common assets before the GFC, between then and the COVID-19 pandemic hitting early last year and then since, shows their correlations have altered.
Whether before or after the global financial crisis, or then to the pandemic, government bonds and commodities were relatively little correlated with other assets. This implies that they seem good diversifiers for riskier assets, such as high yield debt or equities.
That said, the change in correlations since the GFC, brought about by central bank asset-purchases and intended to stabilise asset prices, and unprecedented government spending programmes has made it more difficult to diversify portfolios. Investment grade bonds have become more correlated with other asset classes and commodities have lost some of their appeal as diversifiers through higher correlation.
The influence of macroeconomic variables
One potential way to improve portfolio diversification decisions, in addition to perhaps allocating to private markets, is by having a better understanding of the drivers of co-movements between asset class correlations. This is where macroeconomic variables can help.
Traditionally, growth and inflation are common macroeconomic indicators, driving returns in financial markets. Indeed, growth (or its lack) can account for much of the difference in the co-movement of assets, while inflation frequently helps real assets, such as commodities, to outperform. In addition to growth and inflation, monetary policy can be another driver.
It should come as no surprise that inflation is most negatively correlated with fixed income assets, while being positively correlated with commodities. When it comes to growth, it is most positively related with equities, cyclical commodities and real estate, though weighs on returns of gold. The easier monetary policy conditions seen since 2008, and even more so since the pandemic, created an environment where riskier fixed income and equities prosper, while returns on developed government bonds struggle.
Tactical tilts
Given that asset classes have become more correlated over the last decade and that groups of assets (perhaps risky, cyclical or real assets) are associated with specific macro “weather”, this information can help to find tactical overlay portfolio strategies. One might overweight assets that benefit from the current economic environment, and underweighting those expected to struggle.
But it’s more difficult than that
Also, macroeconomic variables have become more correlated with each other in recent years. Inflation, in particular, has been more correlated to growth and monetary policy in the last decade. In a world when everything is correlated, it might be tempting to focus on high-returning assets.
But there is a danger to acting as if history is a guide to future correlations. Correlations between macroeconomic variables can reverse. And quickly. As such, perhaps it’s time to consider linking portfolio diversification decisions with the prevalence and co-movement of macro indicators.
Related articles
Disclaimer
This communication is general in nature and provided for information/educational purposes only. It does not take into account any specific investment objectives, the financial situation or particular needs of any particular person. It not intended for distribution, publication, or use in any jurisdiction where such distribution, publication, or use would be unlawful, nor is it aimed at any person or entity to whom it would be unlawful for them to access.
This communication has been prepared by Barclays Private Bank (Barclays) and references to Barclays includes any entity within the Barclays group of companies.
This communication:
(i) is not research nor a product of the Barclays Research department. Any views expressed in these materials may differ from those of the Barclays Research department. All opinions and estimates are given as of the date of the materials and are subject to change. Barclays is not obliged to inform recipients of these materials of any change to such opinions or estimates;
(ii) is not an offer, an invitation or a recommendation to enter into any product or service and does not constitute a solicitation to buy or sell securities, investment advice or a personal recommendation;
(iii) is confidential and no part may be reproduced, distributed or transmitted without the prior written permission of Barclays; and
(iv) has not been reviewed or approved by any regulatory authority.
Any past or simulated past performance including back-testing, modelling or scenario analysis, or future projections contained in this communication is no indication as to future performance. No representation is made as to the accuracy of the assumptions made in this communication, or completeness of, any modelling, scenario analysis or back-testing. The value of any investment may also fluctuate as a result of market changes.
Where information in this communication has been obtained from third party sources, we believe those sources to be reliable but we do not guarantee the information’s accuracy and you should note that it may be incomplete or condensed.
Neither Barclays nor any of its directors, officers, employees, representatives or agents, accepts any liability whatsoever for any direct, indirect or consequential losses (in contract, tort or otherwise) arising from the use of this communication or its contents or reliance on the information contained herein, except to the extent this would be prohibited by law or regulation.